1. The rise of shared autonomous vehicles will be the next decade’s great wave of creative destruction. Ride sharing services may upend global personal transportation by driving a shift to a much more efficient use of the world’s light vehicle fleet. The same technological shift has taken self-driving, autonomous vehicles out of the dreams of engineers and onto the streets of American cities. Together, these suites of technologies — “shared autonomy” — could have the kind of revolutionary effect on established transportation industries that cars had on horse-drawn carriages. Over the next decade, tens of millions of city dwellers will come to think of transportation as a driverless car that appears when you press a button on your smartphone, and carries you to your destination while you read a book or watch TV. The implications will be profound for auto-makers, car rental companies, car dealerships, oil companies, electric vehicle manufacturers, and many others; even real estate will be affected as the currently enormous need for urban parking space declines. Established players now see the writing on the wall and are scrambling to catch up — but history suggests that almost all of them will fail. For now, while Detroit is wedded to its past and to its self-image as a maker of particular products called “cars,” Silicon Valley is prepared to delight customers by ruthlessly exploiting the huge inefficiencies that are baked in to the world’s current private car infrastructure.
2. Market summary. Good news abounds in the U.S. and around the world. Earnings drive stock-market prices; economic activity drives earnings, and economic activity is stronger than it has been in years. Economics and corporate profits are strong and improving in the U.S. First-quarter earnings increases are trending toward 14%, which would be a much-better-than-expected result. Revenues appear to be headed for a 5–8% increase, also above expectations. U.S. stocks are attractive, especially in our favorite industries such as technology. Selected companies in pharmaceuticals and biotech, as well as global industrial stalwarts that can grow as the world grows, are also on our favorites list.
Economic data and corporate profits are good and improving throughout the world. The world economy is growing faster than it has for several years. The OECD Global Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is rising as it did in 2011 — well above the level of 2012–2016. Stocks are strong in Europe, Taiwan, Singapore and India.
Oil is in a correction phase, faced with numerous headwinds as demand for gasoline is falling in the U.S. and the developed world. U.S. shale production is helping keep oil prices down. Gold is in a normal correction. Lower global oil prices and moderate food prices are keeping inflation down and putting pressure on the gold price. Gold is not reacting to worldwide political turmoil, as investors appear to believe the price already discounts it.
The Biggest Transformation of the Next Decade: Disrupting Global Transportation
Gridlock in Washington, whether real or apparent, has slowed the “Trump trade.” Market enthusiasm in the election’s wake focused on the beneficiaries of tax reform, regulatory relief, and infrastructure development, and with progress on those fronts in question, enthusiasm has turned to the other irrepressible stalwarts: the U.S.’ big, disruptive tech companies. The chief suspects here are the likes of Alphabet [NASDAQ: GOOG], Amazon [NASDAQ: AMZN], Facebook [NASDAQ: FB], and Apple [NASDAQ: AAPL]; but there are many others. [Note: Guild owns each of these stocks for some clients; please see our disclosures at the end of this newsletter.]
Market sentiment is favoring these companies for the same reason that we have favored them. Each in their own way, they are relentlessly driven to capture the new opportunities opened by the “fourth industrial revolution.”
If you think about the wealth that was created by disruptors in the first three industrial revolutions, and the pain that came in each transition, you’ll see why investors are so eager to participate, and why these disruptors are a constant focus of our attention.
What Makes the Disruptors Different
For now, the Silicon Valley disruptors who maintain a “Day 1” vigilance and energy are succeeding in one crucial task: they do not think of themselves first as product manufacturers, but as customer satisfiers. As AMZN chief Jeff Bezos noted in his letter to shareholders earlier this month:
“There are many advantages to a customer-centric approach, but here’s the big one: customers are always beautifully, wonderfully dissatisfied, even when they report being happy and business is great. Even when they don’t yet know it, customers want something better, and your desire to delight customers will drive you to invent on their behalf. No customer ever asked Amazon to create the Prime membership program, but it sure turns out they wanted it…”
The disruptors see the potential customer satisfactions that can be created with new technology; and rather than stay fixed in the manufacture of a product by which they define themselves, they freely transform their offerings to give customers what they really want — even if those customers don’t yet know what that is.
The biggest example of this transformation and this disruption that we can see coming in the next decade will be in transportation. Put very simply, Detroit’s big firms identified themselves as car-makers — but the Silicon Valley disruptors who will eat Detroit’s lunch will identify themselves as people transporters. Detroit will keep trying to sell cars, while Silicon Valley will identify and remedy the huge inefficiencies that plague the transportation system, and delight customers in a way Detroit can still barely imagine. (They are beginning to imagine it, and racing to catch up — but history does not bode well for their efforts.)
The Eye of the Storm: Autonomous Vehicles, Ride Sharing, and Yes — Flying Cars
These considerations came into focus for us in the past week with two news items related to GOOG.
First, in GOOG’s first-quarter results, the company announced that ordinary consumers would be participating in real-world testing of its autonomous (that is, driverless) cars. A hundred “early rider” families in Arizona signed up with Waymo — GOOG’s new name for its self-driving car division — to use a fleet of minivans for all their transportation needs. They won’t have a car standing by; they’ll hail one from a smartphone app. For now, these cars will have an engineer present at the wheel and ready to take over operating the vehicle as necessary.
(Second, GOOG chief Larry Page’s Kitty Hawk startup announced the arrival of a flying car. That one was a bit of a disappointment, as it turned out to be not so much a flying car as a flying jet ski — definitely a recreation opportunity rather than a transportation option. But don’t lose heart — there’s hope for your flying car yet, as we’ll discuss below.)
This is not the first deployment of user-hailed autonomous vehicles. Uber Technologies made an abortive attempt to do it in San Francisco last year, before they baulked at California’s regulatory requirements; they also headed to Arizona, where the state authorities have been more accommodating. A similar operation in Pittsburgh met with public opposition sparked by Uber CEO Travis Kalanick’s participation in President Trump’s roundtable of tech entrepreneurs. (Uber has had a number of public relations gaffes and accusations of managerial dysfunction.) Although GOOG and Uber are running the only current public trials of autonomous shared vehicles, many others have announced plans — notably General Motors [NYSE: GM], which owns a stake in ride share service Lyft. Some other major carmakers who at least want to be seen jumping on the bandwagon include Ford [NYSE: F], Peugeot [France: UG], Volkswagen [Germany: VOW], BMW [Germany: BMW], Volvo [Hong Kong: 0175], and Renault [France: RNO]. Many of them are making deals to cooperate with local authorities in the U.S., Europe, and China.
The flood of deals and announcements made starting in the second half of 2016 suggests to us that the technology may be accelerating more than the market appreciates. And that spells major disruption for global transportation — as major as the arrival of the railroads, and as major as Henry Ford’s mass production of the Model T.
Technology and Economic Reality Will Eat Your Car
Here’s why change is inexorable.
One: The world’s fleet of light vehicles is an incredibly inefficient use of capital. The average vehicle is in use less than an hour a day, a utilization rate of 4%. But the average vehicle can carry five passengers, and on an average trip carries only 1.5. So the real utilization rate of available seat-miles is just over 1%. The reason that ride-sharing services such as Uber and Lyft have gained such rapid traction is that they are grabbing the low-hanging fruit in remedying that inefficiency.
Instead of thinking about a market for cars, the way Detroit does, Silicon Valley thinks about providing satisfying passenger miles to customers. And Silicon Valley’s technology can push down the price of passenger miles by an order of magnitude.
In four years, Uber has gone from no share in global light vehicle passenger miles, to a 0.4% share. At 1.7%, its size would rival Toyota [NYSE: TM]. Some analysts expect ride sharing miles to be 25–40% of the global total by 2030.
We do not suggest that Uber will capture all that share: the history of tech disruptors is littered with companies which crashed and burned due to management missteps and other problems and never realized their potential. But if it isn’t Uber, it will be someone else.
Two: Driving is a vast waste of time, and therefore money. With global light vehicle traffic covering 10 trillion miles a year at an average speed of 25 miles per hour, that’s 400 billion person-hours of time spent behind the wheel of a car (600 billion if you include passengers). The value of that time is part of the opportunity cost of the current system of private car ownership. At $10 an hour, it equals about 5–8% of global GDP. (You can decide whether that $10 figure is accurate for yourself.) And of course, even in a ride sharing situation, paying the driver for his or her time accounts for about half the cost of a passenger mile.
Further, with more than a million road deaths a year worldwide, most caused by human error, the reality — as uncomfortable as it may be for us proud humans to admit — is that robot cars will on the whole be a lot safer. High profile events notwithstanding, Tesla Motors [NASDAQ: TSLA] has already noted a 40% decline in accidents involving their models equipped with advanced driver assistance technologies. (And if you think humans won’t accept this reality, ask yourself how many friends you have who prefer an abacus to a calculator.)
Phones and Robots
Two suites of “fourth industrial revolution” technology make this situation ripe for disruption. First, smartphones and the internet make ride sharing feasible — that’s the first layer and the low-hanging fruit. Second, artificial intelligence and robotics are now on the cusp of removing the need for a human driver. This second item is not years away; it is being deployed now. The fundamental challenges are no longer technical; they are social and political. And although history has shown that social and political challenges can slow the adoption of technologies that improve human life, history also shows that they ultimately will fail to stop it.
Together, these add up to what some analysts refer to as “shared autonomy” or “Auto 2.0.”
With Uber and GOOG’s early public trials, the future is coming into view: a world in which transportation is an on-demand utility no longer bound to personal ownership of a given product, such as a car. You will press a button on your phone, and a robot car will appear and take you where you want to go. We emphasize again that this is not hopeful science fiction: it’s actually happening today in Phoenix. (From one perspective, this is what it looks like when private enterprise provides public transportation.)
The pace of adoption will vary widely by geography and with political and economic factors, as California already discovered when GOOG and Uber centered their public debuts in Arizona. But the shift will be driven, in the end, by the more rational economics of shared autonomous vehicles, which will give customers what they want at a price they love.
The implications of this shift are legion. Obviously, light vehicle manufacturers are front and center in the line of fire. They are late to the game, and they lack the dynamic “Day 1” corporate culture of their Silicon Valley competitors. Their public efforts could be more spectacle than substance, though both F and GM are deploying significant resources to the effort. These incumbents have enormous capital, and should be watched. Rental car companies are already under pressure from ride sharing, and that pressure will not be relenting.
Notably, the move to shared autonomy may accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles, with potentially significant implications both for manufacturers and for global oil demand. While electric passenger vehicles typically have a fuel cost per mile of about 3 cents, versus 7.5 cents for an internal combustion engine, electric vehicles cost more up front. Right now, the payback period to benefit from the lower fuel costs can be 30 years. But as shared autonomous vehicles raise the utilization rate, that payback period could quickly drop to 2 or 3 years. This positive feedback loop of intersecting technologies could result in market changes of surprising speed and magnitude.
And finally, we would be remiss not to offer you your flying car. With all respect to the fun time that Larry Page’s baby could offer you over a lake in northern California, have a look instead at the eHang 184 — a single-passenger autonomous drone scheduled to begin testing in Dubai this summer, and in the U.S. by 2020. (eHang is a private company headquartered in Guangdong, China.)
Uber Technologies has established a division called “Elevate,” which last year published a white paper called Fast-Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation.
We know you’ve been waiting since The Jetsons, but with all due caution, this looks like the real deal.
Investment implications: Even contrarian investors should be cautious when they look at the shares of big auto manufacturers: they may be cheap for a reason, and that reason may become clearer in coming years. Nevertheless, just as it would be foolish to count out Wal-Mart [NYSE: WMT] in the battle with AMZN, investors should monitor the shared autonomy plans of GM, F, and others. The growth of shared autonomy will mean that passenger miles will be growing significantly faster than vehicle sales in the long run. At this juncture, we like the big, disruptive U.S. tech stocks that we have mentioned, and we caution investors that technological promise does not mean that any stock is selling at a rational or desirable price. Some automotive equipment manufacturers, although not pure plays, may offer exposure to the theme of autonomy, such as Magna International [NYSE: MGA] and Delphi [NYSE: DLPH]. TSLA is an obvious participant, both in shared autonomy and in the growth of electric vehicles and in battery technology; we would look for a rational entry point for TSLA shares. Finally, the potential inflection of electric vehicle sales in coming years suggests that investors look closely at lithium producers, and oil investors should consider and monitor the longer-term demand implications of these new technologies.
Economically and profit-wise, the good news abounds for the earnings of U.S. companies. As we all know, earnings drive stock-market prices. Economic activity drives earnings, and economic activity is stronger than it has been in years. Strong earnings drive higher prices.
First, economics and corporate profits are strong and improving in the U.S. Both businesses and consumers are expanding their economic activity.
With over two thirds of U.S. companies having reported, first-quarter earnings increases are trending toward 14%, which would be a much-better-than-expected result. Early expectations were for about 5% earnings increase. Revenues appear to be headed for a 5–8% increase, also above expectations.
U.S. home sales were up 5.8% in March. Auto sales were down in April, but heavy truck orders increased 3% and are up 75% versus a year ago. This is a sign of rising corporate capital expenditures.
Mortgage rates are now falling and are below 4%; as a result, applications for new mortgages are rising strongly.
In another sign of expanding economic growth on the corporate level, U.S. bank loans increased by over $80 billion in the last month. Employment and demand for labor remains strong; recently, Infosys, the big Indian tech company [NYSE: INFY] has made a commitment to hire 10,000 American workers.
Second, U.S. stocks are attractive, especially in our favorite industries such as technology (both old line favorites and new technology disruptors). Financials depend greatly on a tax cut for corporates, since they as a group pay a very large Federal rate and state rates as well. Selected companies in pharmaceuticals and biotech as well as global industrial stalwarts that can grow as the world grows are also on our favorites list.
Third, economic data and corporate profits are good and improving throughout the world.
Taiwan, Singapore, and Korea, as well as Spain and several other European countries, announced stronger economic activity. The world economy is growing faster than it has for several years. India added 12 million new jobs last year.
The OECD Global Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is rising as it did in 2011 — well above the level of 2012–2016. Corporate profits in Europe for the first quarter grew at a rate well above expectations, with upward stock earnings revisions at the highest level in six years.
Fourth, stocks are strong in Europe, Taiwan, Singapore and India. They are strengthening in Japan. We recommend investors buy Europe, India, and Taiwan; country-level ETFs exist for these countries. We suggest that buyers wait for small market corrections before adding to positions.
Fifth, oil is in a correction phase. Oil is faced with numerous headwinds as demand for gasoline is falling in the U.S. and the developed world, and OPEC has the capacity to keep the price of oil low if they once again begin to produce at the level of a few months ago. U.S. shale production has grown faster than market estimates. This excess U.S. shale production is helping keep oil prices down.
Finally, gold is in a normal correction. Lower global oil prices and moderate food prices caused by very strong grain production throughout the world are keeping inflation down and putting pressure on the gold price. Gold is not reacting to worldwide political turmoil, as investors appear to believe the price already discounts it.
Thanks for listening; we welcome your calls and questions.
The publisher of this newsletter is Guild Investment Management, Inc. (GIM or Guild), an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. GIM manages the accounts of high net worth individuals,investment partnerships, trusts and estates, pension and profit sharing plans, and corporations, among other clients.
Your receipt of this newsletter does not create a personal investment advisory relationship with GIM although some recipients may also be advisory clients of GIM. GIM has written investment advisory agreements with all its personal advisory clients, which sets forth the nature of that relationship.
The newsletter makes general observations about markets and business and financial trends and may provide advice about specific companies and specific investments. It does not give personal investment advice tailored to the needs, objectives, and circumstances of individual readers. Whether investment ideas and recommendations are suitable for individual readers depends substantially on the personal and financial situation of that reader, which GIM, as the publisher of the newsletter, makes no effort to investigate.
GIM attempts to provide accurate content in its newsletters to the extent such content is factual rather than analysis and opinion, but GIM relies primarily on information compiled or reported by third parties and does not generally attempt to independently verify or investigate such information. Moreover, some content and some of the assumptions, formulas, algorithms and other data that affect the content may be inaccurate, outdated, or otherwise flawed. GIM does not guarantee or take responsibility for the accuracy of such information. Please note that investing in stocks, other securities, and commodities is inherently risky, and you should rely on your personal financial advisors and conduct your own due diligence in connection with any investment decision.
A Special Comment for Guild’s Clients
If you are an investment advisory client of GIM who is receiving this newsletter, please note that the fact that a general recommendation is made of a particular security, commodity, or investment area to its newsletter subscribers does not mean that investment is suitable for you or should be purchased by you. For example, GIM may already have purchased such securities on your behalf or purchased securities in the same industry (and an increase in the position for you may represent too much concentration in one security or industry), or GIM may believe the investment is not suitable for you based on your risk tolerance or other factors. If you have questions about the recommendations in this newsletter in relation to your account at GIM, please contact Monty Guild or Tony Danaher.
Conflicts of Interest
As of the date of this newsletter, GIM’s investment advisory clients or GIM’s principals owned positions in areas that are the subject of current recommendations, commentary, analysis, opinions, or advice, contained in this newsletter. GIM’s advisory clients or principals are currently long U.S. and foreign equities. GIM and its principals have certain conflicts of interest in its relations with its investment advisory clients and its newsletter subscribers resulting from GIM or its principals holding positions for its clients or themselves which are also recommended to its clients. GIM may change the positions of its clients or GIM’s principals may change their positions (increasing, decreasing, and eliminating them) based on GIM’s best judgment at any given time, including the time of publication of the newsletter. Factors that lead GIM to change or eliminate its positions may include general market developments, factors specific to the issuer, or the needs of GIM or its advisory clients. From time to time GIM’s investing goals on behalf of its investment advisory clients or the personal investing goals of GIM’s principals and their risk tolerance may be different from those discussed in the newsletter, and the investment decisions made by GIM for its advisory clients or the investment decisions of
its principals may vary from (and may even be contrary to) the advice and recommendations in the newsletter.
In addition, GIM or its principals may reduce or eliminate their positions in an investment that is recommended in the newsletter prior to notifying the newsletter subscribers of such a reduction or elimination. The publication by GIM of a “target price” or “stop loss” for a particular security or other asset does not necessarily represent the price at which GIM intends to sell or will sell any such assets for its advisory clients or the price at which GIM’s principals intend to sell any such assets.
As a consequence of the conflict of interest, GIM’s clients or principals may benefit if newsletter subscribers purchase assets recommended by GIM since it could increase the value of the assets already held by GIM’s investment advisory clients or GIM’s principals. On the other hand, GIM’s principals and clients may suffer a detriment if they seek to acquire additional shares in securities that have been recommended and the price of the securities has increased as a result of purchases by newsletter subscribers.
To help mitigate these conflicts, GIM seeks to avoid recommending the securities of individual companies where GIM or its principals have an ownership position and where the issuer is small or its securities are thinly traded−that way sales by GIM in advance of possible sales by newsletter subscribers would not be likely to cause any significant decrease in the sale price to newsletter subscribers. GIM has a fiduciary relationship with its investment advisory clients and cannot agree on behalf of such clients to refrain from purchases or sales of a security mentioned in the newsletter for a period of time before or after recommendations for purchases or sales are made to its newsletter subscribers.
GIM encourages you to do independent research on the securities or other assets discussed or recommended in the newsletter prior to making any investment decisions and to be especially cautious of investments in small, thinly-traded companies, which are usually the most risky investments that you can make.
Disclaimer of Liability
GIM disclaims any liability for investment decisions based upon recommendations, information, or opinions in its newsletters. GIM is not soliciting you to execute any trade. Nothing contained in GIM’s newsletters is intended to be, nor shall it be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities or to give individual investment advice.
The information in the newsletter is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any
jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or which would subject GIM to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PRINT ONCE —- DO NOT FORWARD—-DO NOT COPY
Guild’s current and past market commentaries are protected by U.S. and International copyright laws. All
rights reserved. You must not copy, frame, modify, transmit, further distribute, or use the market commentaries, without the prior written consent of Guild. This email or any download from a secure website is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this email in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email is similarly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message from your system. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Guild Investment Management for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message from your system. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Guild Investment Management for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.